Attitudes Towards Technology: Han China and Roman Empire Essay

Han and Roman military capabilitys towards applied science in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards cardinal main categories, positive and prohibit.The Majority of the docuwork forcets had positive attitudes towards applied science because of its unequivocal benefits to the agents cities. Documents 1 and 8 show government officials in campaign of water engineering. Both show obvious support for the technology they atomic number 18 associated with, preventing floods or creating aqueducts for their cities. Also, their jobs require them to use technology so they must bring forth an appreciation for it. Documents 3 and 4 describe times when the technology utilise to help citizens direct their water to help productivity.It is shown that both government and philosophers plan a benefit of technology in society, clearly improving productivity for their whole country. Lastly, Document 6 shows Plutarch, a high government official, make-up of the creation of roads that helped the mobility of horses, the organization of cities, and beauty of the land.On the other hand, some documents show points of view seeing technology in a disconfirming light. Document 2 shows a govt. official describing the bad quality of technology because of lack of workers and quality labor. He also states that the lack of quality technology causes an increase in the iron and salt prices, resulting in lack of seasoner for the peasants food and lack of strong tools for farming. Documents 5 and 7 show cardinal Roman upper trackman opposed to technology because they believe inventors and craftsment lack learning and enlightenment.Their were two main point of view that could make water affected the yield of the documents position on the matter. The get-go is shown in documents 1 and 8 where the sources ar men with an occupation in technological work. This means they must have started with an appreciation for it. Also, the more than they advertised the ideas of their technolo gies, the transgress the business was for them, making them more wealthy and important, thus more powerful. The second point of view comes from positions of genuinely high power and little knowledge of the use of technology. Shown in documents 5 and 7 are two sources that have very high positions in their society where they lack experience and knowledge of the uses of technology. Had they known more and had first hand experience with tools and different crafts, they might have abetter appreciation for such vulgar jobs.Looking over the documents, it is made obvious that all the document come from high class citizens fiving us no perspective from the less wealthy. Had we gotten a document from a lower class citizen, we would then be able to draw info on how technology affected the larger part of societies. Also, all the sources come from male citizens fiving us no knowledge of the effect it technology had on the women. Perhaps their family unit lives were affected greatly by the cr eation of tools, an area of daily lives men of the upper class would have no knowledge of. The majority of attitude towards technology during the Han dynasty and Roman Empire reasonably was positive, but the portion of negative responses lay mostly in areas of lack of knowledge on the subject.