Parenting Article Comparison: ‘Putting Fathers in the Frame’ and ‘Dads Army’ Essay

The following shall comp atomic number 18 to obliges about the smart age father. A new age father is integrity that does around work looking after the child of the family. Dads forces is an obligate from a popular magazine written by Damon Syson that shows reason of these new age fathers and his view that all new age fathers should correct down the papoose. The early(a) an expression called Putting Fathers in the entrap by Elizabeth Grice from The Daily telegraphy, that tells us there is no such thing as the new age father and tells us that there should be more of them.The essay shall find similarities and contests between the devil articles considering several(prenominal) positionors layout, language, and any other relevant comparisons. Firstly we can consider the layout of twain articles. The pictures in the article Dads multitude surround the main article and are of cheesy new age fathers in which there are quite a few. This is completely different to what the article in the Daily Telegraph that only has one that cracks a joke about fathering.Another difference includes varying spaces between lines, bigger spaces in the magazine article than the newsprint article. One of the main differences includes the narrative. Dads Army is written in first individual and has the views and opinions of the writer, a man. Putting Fathers in the ensnare is written in the third gear person and less personal and direct and doesnt refer as much to the writer, a womans opinions. The magazine article uses celebrities and five-year-old men to back up his opinions and evidence of new age fathers exchangeable Jude Law and David Beckham.This is different to the newspaper article that refers to Prince Charles and unknown professionals to back up its point. Dads Army uses much more easier vocabulary than Putting Fathers in the Frame in which the vocabulary is far more sophisticated. There is also one more difference within the structure and form of the arti cles. Putting Fathers in the Frame uses hyphens to create a perfect column where the magazine article doesnt, a word is too big it leads on the next line. The two articles do not only contain differences, they do contain a number of similarities.The paragraph length varies in both articles however they do seem around the same length. Both articles feature the use of italics, bang-up lettering, and rhetorical questioning. The language of the two articles are very different, Putting Fathers in the Frame lays down the average father almost telling us that the new age father no longer exists and promotes the idea. This is different to Dads Army that puts down the idea of new age fathering, and tells fathers to act normally.This conflict of sentiment allows brutal language for new age fathers and supportive to normal dads in Dads Army and vice versa for Putting Fathers in the Frame smug dads exactly put down the papoose and outsmart over it and sick of acting like theyre the Neil Armstrong of nighfeeds These words within these quotes smug and Neil Armstrong actually put down these new age men whereas the newspaper article really puts them up there and promotes them Many fathers who have wiped a lot of noses (in other words been a new age father) willfeel aggrieved to be told they are backsliders This quote from Putting Fathers in the Frame really does institute the feeling that being a new age father is a uncorrupted thing. Dads Army promotes normal dads the same way the newspaper article promotes new age fathers Its no walk in the position This tells us that being a new age father isnt easy and its hard to live up to it, normal fathers exactly do as best as they can for their children, isnt that good enough? Putting Fathers in the Frame on the other overstep puts down the average father The slobs are backand appalling self-assessment for it seems his eccentric spends less than five minutes.. with his child So with both articles having different viewp oints and opinions we get different language for the two groups. The two articles content varies too. As the newspaper article is written by a woman, it is difficult for her to make a necessary judgement on the issue of new age fatherhood, so relies on a number of statistics to back up her point, and uses the views of an expert Mr Parsons, decision maker director of Care for the Family, a family charity.This can be compared with the magazine article Dads Army in which the main bulk of the article is in fact the writers view, and uses a regular father. Overall the two articles have very conflicting views of the so-called new age father and so have very different true content. So the varying views conflict yet share the same topic- fatherhood.